Music & Randomness@ Your Fingertips
  • facebook

Those that know me on a personal level know that movies aren’t really my cup of tea. I find a lot of Hollywood movies to be unoriginal with plot development and creativity in storyline development. I much prefer going to a concert, musical, or play as opposed to go to a movie. In essence, due to my short attention span, and due to myself having difficulty just sitting down and watching a movie, I have the tendency to get bored quite easily with a particular movie. This past Friday, after work, I was invited by a friend to go see “Act of Valor” which primarily consists of active Navy Seal members as the cast of this particular movie.

I was also intrigued by the various reviews I’ve read and I figured, it’s something original, therefore, I’m going to give it a shot. In essence, the plot of this movie is a group of Navy Seals attempting to stop a Jihadi-terrorism plot that occurs in the Mexicali area of Baja California and the northwest part of Mexico. This group of Navy Seals leave everything behind in an effort to prevent this catastrophic terrorist plot that would collapse the world economy and I quote “make 9/11 look like a walk in the park”.

Regular movie critics will complain about the acting in this movie. Keep in mind, my readers, these active Navy Seal members are not professional actors, they are Navy Seals. However, due to the intensity in certain scenes that had actual live-action fire rounds going off, what these brave men have probably went through brought a real sense of authenticity to the various scenes. Because of this authenticity in the imagery, it caused the average movie attendee to be on the edge of their seat and attempt to develop a sense of understanding of what the men and women in the military do everyday. There are mulitple missions and exercises in this film, and the first-person shots from behind the assault weapons are original and uncanny. The attendee will definitely appreciate the funeral scene, the reading of the quote from a pilot killed during World War II, and especially reading the quote from Shawnee Chief Tecumseh.

What these Navy Seals brought is a breath of fresh-air to the dry movie spell in Hollywood lately. The scene where the two Seals walk off after talking about their latest mission is a scene that is especially memorable. It’s that complete confidence and self-control, that swagger if you will, that they are the best in the world at what they do. It’s a feeling that they have ice water in their veins in the heat of the battle, and the attendee can sense that. This is a movie that captures the imagination of what the members of the United States military goes through on a daily basis, it’s stories of triumph, paying the ultimate sacrifice, and courage. All politics aside, definitely take a night off and go see this movie.
YouTube Preview Image

Drive is a film I was excited for the moment I heard about it. Ryan Gosling – who is reaching Must Watch Anything He’s In territory – stars alongside Carey Mulligan, with Breaking Bad’s Bryan Cranston, and the great Albert Brooks in supporting roles. The film doesn’t waste any time setting up the premise and introducing you to Ryan Gosling’s character, simply known as the Driver, or the Kid. We never find out his name, and it is all the more fitting that we don’t, much like in Fight Club. The Kid is a stunt driver for the movies when the sun shines, and a getaway driver by the moonlight. Drive’s opening scene involves the latter, and you immediately find out how calm, calculated, and seemingly composed The Driver is, no matter how intense the situation at hand may be. He conducts his business exactly as he tells his clients he will, and is talented enough at it that he seems more interested in the LA Clippers game that he has on his radio, than he is with the current task at hand. We aren’t privy to any history about the Kid, and I think it’s better that way. They set the movie up, we find out what he does and how well he does it, and then the story truly begins.

After his initial moonlighting job, he heads to his apartment, where we are introduced to the absolutely stunning Carey Mulligan. She portrays her characters with such ease and skill, that it’s impossible not to enjoy her every moment she’s on the screen. It is no different in Drive. Her introduction is equipped with a slow motion shot, and it’s easy to see why. Carey, or Irene, and the Driver are made aware of each other on the elevator both on their way up to their apartments. Hers is just down the hall from his. Their exchanges and dialogue throughout the film are short, concise and perfect, and their meeting on the elevator is no different. They say almost nothing, but they both clearly note the other and take in everything they can in the few seconds they have. It’s a nice introduction to the dynamic between both characters, which is one of the most, if not THE most, engaging and lasting aspect of the film. Gosling and Mulligan are flawless together and it is as though they have been acting with each other since they both began. In fact, all the main characters in Drive have a great chemistry, which is very much a credit to the director, Nicolas Winding Refn. He really lets the movie breath. He never tries to cram too much into any scene. He instead gives us precise, creative shots, and lets the actors and the scene itself unfold. There is no filler here, as every scene is exactly as it should be, and you never get a sense that the film drags or is wearing out its welcome. It is very rare in Hollywood that someone makes a dramatic thriller that isn’t filled with explosions, overly dramatic acting, poor writing, and the philosophy that excess, and More More More is somehow better. Drive is the anti-action film, as it goes about doing its thing in almost the complete opposite way of the norm.

The always talented Bryan Cranston plays Shannon. He is the Driver’s boss (and the one that calls him The Kid) and he owns an auto repair garage. He hired the kid on the spot the day he drifted into town five years or so previously. He’s been his agent and mentor so to speak, ever since. He hires him out to film companies, he does stunt work for them, Shannon gets half, and the Kid never thinks twice or bats an eye about it. He is so quiet and soft-spoken, but there is always that glimmer of danger about him just under the surface, enough to where we can catch a glimpse of it, but have no idea what sort of event or feeling would have to occur to bring it out from the depths of his inner turmoil. There is obviously a lot of layers and darkness to this kid, and we never find out why. It is the most intriguing, exciting thing about him.

Once the main characters are introduced, we find out Shannon wants to start a business venture into the world of racing. The Driver would of course be his star, or rather his Golden Ticket to riches and success, which seems to be Shannon’s motive for everything he does. He’s a schemer and a bullshitter, but we never get a sense that he’s a bad person. He has a bit of fatherly instinct when it comes to the Kid, and although he doesn’t exactly do what is best for him at every turn, he never seems to want anything but the best for him – as long as it increases his own bank account. To attempt success in the racing world, you of course need a car. That’s where Albert Brooks’ character comes into play. He used to produce actions movies in the 80s – a definite nod to a lot of this movies’ inspiration – and seems to be somewhat of a crime lord now. He loans Shannon the money, he meets the Kid (in a great scene where the tension strings really begin to tighten and the plot takes off), and the dangerous thriller element enters into play. I need to specifically mention the score of this film, brought to us by Cliff Martinez. It accentuates every scene in the film, especially as the tension builds. The music is cold, mostly electronic, and is very much alive (or dead rather) with the spirit of the 80s. Drive really has the feel of an 80s-era film at times, but in no way is that a bad thing. It takes out all the cheese and fluff a lot of action films from that day possessed, while retaining the almost mechanical solace that can be found in many of them. The score was vital to the vibe and the mood of the film in every way.

There are two elements of this film that really stand out to me. One is the way the scenes with Irene and the Driver are filmed. The lighting and the shots are almost euphoric, as if presenting this world of golden possibilities for the Driver where he can have this fantastic woman and her son, who he has an immediate and telling connection with. He seems to recognize what is pure, and perhaps even experiences a bit of nostalgia for a time when he might have been the same. That time is clearly far behind him, and it has been replaced with a stark, intensely protective nature, for the child and for Irene. Those are seemingly the only things that could break the complete control and restraint he exudes at every moment, be it serving as a getaway driver, or even the way he removes his driving gloves. The other element is what sets this movie apart from your average thriller. Much like Albert Brooks’ apparent preference and usage of sharp blades, this movie cuts with such a cold precision. The violence is scathing and alarming. It’s quick and abrupt and is completely unsettling. It is really a testament to the director’s talent that the movie transitions between these two elements with such ease. One moment Irene and the Driver take a stroll on the highways and byways of Los Angeles, and have such a beautiful moment together where everything is right in the world and there is no need for even a word of dialogue. Other moments, everything is flipped, heads are blown to bits, skin breaks as easily as the child’s innocence, and unavoidable chaos is rampant. I can’t express enough how engaging this film is from start to finish. There is a clear plot structure here, from the buildup to the climax, and it makes it all the more enjoyable to watch. Every moment is pure cinematic bliss; from the Driver’s serene solo strolls through the city at night, to the unquestionably romantic allure of him and Irene’s relationship, to the devastating violence that is experienced by them all. This is a film I can see standing the test of time, and remaining fresh in my mind and my heart for years to come.

Directing: A+. Under the direction of just about anybody else, this film would not have been executed like it was. Flawless direction.

Acting: A. Everyone acted with such skill and restraint. Gosling, Mulligan and Brooks all deserve Oscar consideration, though they were all snubbed.

Score: A+. The mood music and specific song selections could not have been more fitting for each scene they were attached to. It is probably a bigger Oscar snub than the actors and director that did not get a nomination.

Dialogue\Writing: A. It gets an A more for the intentional lack of dialogue than the actual dialogue itself. Sometimes less is more. Especially if the actors and director know how to pull that off.

Final Grade: A. I haven’t seen a film this memorable and impactful, with such a high rewatchability factor, in a long time. This is the Best Film of 2011. 

CSI is one of the few shows I like to watch on television, and when Laurence Fishburne joined the cast I was suspicious at first, but grew to like his character. Now that he is leaving word is Ted Danson of Cheers fame will take his spot. All I can say is, EPIC FAIL.. 
 
Via ScreenRant, “After just two and a half seasons of replacing William Petersen, film star Laurence Fishburne announced he would be calling it quits on CSI: Crime Scene Investigation – leaving fans to speculate about who would fill the void left in his wake. Now comes word that Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Ted Danson will be joining the crew in Las Vegas. It has been a spectacularly tumultuous few months for the aging police procedural. First came the announcement that CBS had shifted its timeslot (from Thursday to Wednesday), then news that Fishburne would depart – and it seemed aNow, however, in a clever piece of casting (that may just be the spark needed to get over the absence of a particular cast member), CSI has chosen to bring television veteran Ted Danson to the scene of the crime. Reportedly, the network initially sought another movie star for the role, but thought better of the idea and began to look at seasoned television actors who could embody the specific character the writers and producers had cooked up to replace Fishburne”.
 
 
And so let the speculation begin….
Despite having fostered at-least one love child, and with rumors of many more. The Arnold is set to begin his comeback movie, and its a western….
 
Via Reuters, “Two months after putting his Hollywood return on hold following a damaging sex scandal, Arnold Schwarzenegger is ready to get back into the saddle. The former action star turned politician is scheduled to start shooting the Western movie “The Last Stand” in September, a film industry source said on Monday, despite being embroiled in what could be a messy divorce from his wife, Maria Shriver. “It’s an old-fashioned Western specifically designed for a 63 year-old broken-down guy with a moral decision…We always needed an iconic figure for it,” an unnamed movie executive told industry website Deadline Hollywood on Monday. Deadline Hollywood first reported the story, and Schwarzenegger’s participation was also confirmed by Entertainment Weekly magazine. Representatives for the former “Terminator” star, 63, declined comment on the reports, as did a spokesman for the Lionsgate film studio that is behind the movie. But an industry source who asked to remain anonymous confirmed to Reuters that the movie was going ahead as planned with Schwarzenegger in the lead role. Schwarzenegger said in May that he was halting discussions for a new “Terminator” movie and all other Hollywood projects in order to focus on personal matters following an admission that he fathered a secret child 13 years ago with his family’s housekeeper”.
 
 

This past holiday weekend, I was able to take in a movie with some friends. Hollywood seems to be putting out a lot of over- hyped, high-priced drivel lately, so it’d been awhile since I’d decided to drive to the theater and spread my cheeks at the admission window. There was a general consensus amongst my friends and I to go see the latest installment of the Transformers series. We also opted for the 3D version. I thought this would be an Optimus “Prime” opportunity to share my thoughts on the show.

First off, I want to make it clear I went into this movie with pretty much no expectations. I liked the Transformers of the 80′s while growing up, but G.I. Joe was my primary interest. I thoroughly enjoyed the first Transformers movie but was somewhat disappointed in the sequel, “Revenge of the Fallen”. Add to that the fact that regular love interest/scantily-dressed Megan Fox was absent, left a lot of question marks. And, as I mentioned, the mass quantity of Hollywood garbage that’s been making its way to the big screen, yeah, I had zero expectations. The one thing I was certain of, there wouldn’t be any shortage of CGI or Michael Bay action explosion sequences!

I must say, I walked out of the theater pleasantly surprised by the third installment in the Transformers franchise. I thought the story was intriguing, had some surprising twists, the flow was good and never seemed to drag on. They even incorporated historical bits into it, which I thought was great as I’m a bit of a history buff. The movie starts out with the ongoing battle on Cybertron between the Autobots and the Decepticons. The Autobots were losing the war, but apparently had developed a new technology that could swing the tide in their favor. “Sentinel Prime”, then leader of the Autobots, boarded a ship with this new technology and attempted to escape the planet. Unfortunately, the ship was shot down and crash landed on…..you guessed it: the moon. It was 1961, NASA detected the crash, and notified President John F. Kennedy, who then declared the urgent need to reach the moon before the Russians. Years later, when Neil Armstrong landed on the moon, his first task was to inspect and search the crash site. I thought it was pretty cool how they incorporated the “Space Race” into the story. Later on, the Chernobyl nuclear disaster was mixed in as well, adding intrigue to the Russian involvement. I don’t want to go too in-depth on the story itself so as to not spoil anything. If you’re a transformers fan or have seen either of the first two, the meat of the story is the Decepticons/bad guys are trying to take over the world and the Autobots/good guys are trying to stop them. The final battle sequence between the Autobots & human forces vs. the Decepticons ended up being quite a lengthy one that was very action packed. But in comparison, the big showdown between Optimus Prime and Megatron seemed somewhat short.

As far as the cast goes, it was mostly intact from the previous films. Shia LaBeouf of course, John Turturro, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, etc. The only difference, albeit a huge difference, was the absence of Megan Fox. There’s still a lot of speculation as to why she wasn’t brought back for this film. My guess is they didn’t have enough cash in the special effects budget to constantly digitally cover all the lame, cheesy-ass tattoos she’s gotten the last few years. I was skeptical about her being gone, but let’s face it, she never really played a critical acting roll. She primarily just had to stand there, look hot, contort herself in cut off shorts into a really awkward position to detail paint a motorcycle, and run when the script called for it. But, she did all these things so well! I don’t care what anyone says, when you start swapping cast members, it can really mess with the chemistry. Especially when you’re accustomed to seeing that particular person playing that particular role. Well my friends, let me say that after the movie had ended, one of the first things that came to mind was: “Megan who?” Victoria’s Secret model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley filled the new eye candy role quite admirably as “Carly”. Her first scene left one hell of an impression! I won’t go into detail, don’t wanna be the spoiler, but you’ll know what I mean. In a way, she’s the polar opposite of Ms. Fox’s past character. Fox was brunette, “Carly” is blonde. Fox was kinda skanky, the new one is sophisticated and refined. And, to top it off, she’s got a killer British accent…..I’m sold! Ms. Huntington-Whiteley? Yes, have some!


Another pleasant casting surprise were the guest appearances by John Malkovich and Ken Jeong. Neither one played a big role, but both characters added a nice twist. I especially enjoyed Jeong, where he busted out some of the in-your-face, comedic antics you’ve seen from previous characters he’s played in other films. He even used a Pink Floyd reference in trying to pass information to LeBouf’s character, it was classic!

Lastly, I’ll touch on the 3D factor. This was only the second time I’d seen a RealD 3D film. My first was “Avatar”, in which I thought the effects were amazing! Thank goodness because that was the only thing that movie had going for it. But I digress. A friend of mine who’s quite the movie buff gave me an extensive lecture about the 3D money grab. In summary, unless the movie was actually filmed for 3D, you’re just getting ripped off with some half ass added effects. I must say, I’m very glad I saw Transformers 3 in 3D! If this wasn’t indeed filmed for 3D, a great amount of time and attention to detail was invested into the effects. I’m sure 2D looks good too, but I was very much blown away by the detail. I was skeptical because there is usually so much action, especially when the bots are transforming, if it would get muddled and wouldn’t turn out very clear? There were a couple moments where there might have been a little too much going on, but overall, I thought they did a fantastic job between the main figures in the scenes, environments, debris flying around, everything. Several times, after an explosion or when a fire was raging, ashes would fly about, and it seemed like it was right in front of me.

Earlier today, I happened to see a headline “Transformers 3 tops $400 million worldwide”. Pretty damn good numbers! Under the article, people were commenting and upon reading them I couldn’t help but laugh. You had the hardcore uber nerds bitching about it because it wasn’t 100% accurate to what they think it should be. There were the pent up, undersexed teenagers who were furious and refused to see it because Megan Fox wasn’t in it. I’m sure they’re masturbating to “Jennifer’s Body” as I type. Give it up fellas! Anyone who marries Brian Austin Green of ’90′s Beverly Hills 90210 fame is gonna lose hot points anyway. Lastly, there were the typical movie critic buffs complaining because the story didn’t offer anything moving, was predictable, and isn’t Oscar nomination worthy. The only thing I can say to all of them is: “Shut up!” Unless you’ve been living in a cave for the last five years, you have somewhat of an idea of what to expect when you’re in line and purchase a ticket for a Michael Bay Transformers movie. Was it perfect? No. I felt there were some things they could have done better, some parts they could have expanded and elaborated on. But overall, I felt it was a worthwhile mix of a good story, solid acting by a cast we’ve gotten familiar with and know what to expect, coupled with well done effects and the 3D version being the cherry on top. It all comes together for a very worthwhile theater experience!

I was debating on going with either numbers or a letter grade scale? I felt numbers can be somewhat vague and a greater number of people can more easily relate to the classic letter scale from school.
That said, I give “Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon” 3D a solid: B+
YouTube Preview Image

 

Via Fox News,“An indie film produced by an ex-con seeking to solve the cold case of the 1977 murders of three Oklahoma Girl Scouts has divided the town of Tulsa, with locals scrambling for parts in the film and law enforcement officials wary. Not only is the film “Candles” seeking to dramatize the horrific crime, but the filmmaker claims he knows who committed the murder and will reveal who it is in the film. The triple homicide at Camp Scott remains one of the most ghastly cases in Oklahoma history. In 1977 three young Girl Scouts — Lori Lee Farmer, 8, Michelle Guse, 9, and Doris Denise Milner, 10 — all occupants of tent No. 8, were raped, bludgeoned and strangled on their first night at Camp Scott summer camp on June 12. Their bodies were left in the woods bound in rope within their sleeping bags and discovered by a camp counselor the next morning. In 1979 police arrested Gene Leroy Hart, a local prison escapee with a history of violence. He stood trial for the crime and was acquitted, later dying in prison on unrelated charges. In 2007, authorities conducted new DNA testing, but the results proved inconclusive due to deteriorated crime scene evidence. It’s a crime that’s left an indelible mark on the community, and the camp has never been re-opened. Filmmaker John Russell claims that he encountered the real murderer while he was in prison himself for check fraud in 1978. He told FoxNews.com that the killer confessed to the Girl Scout murders in addition to several other crimes. Russell also claims he felt his life was threatened because of his knowledge of the murders for the next three decades and that he was ignored by the authorities when he tried to release the information to them 30 years ago. The man in charge of the area where the murders took place, Mayes County Sheriff Frank Cantey, said he can’t speak to what Russell may have said to police three decades ago, but he tells FoxNews.com he hasn’t been contacted by Russell and that he knows of no harassment the filmmaker has received from the police force with regards to his claims over the Camp Scott murders. The original police officers who investigated the crimes for Mayes County are no longer with the force, Cantey said. “I have been sheriff for 11 years and I don’t know that I have ever talked to this guy,” Cantey said. He added that his office does follow up on any credible leads regarding the three decades-old murders that tend to surface from time to time. The director of the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation has been in contact with Russell and is looking into whether his claim to know the murderer is credible”.
Holy trolls and goblins Batman…..

It reveals much more of the storyline also, here’s to hoping they do it right….
 
 

Looks very interesting, I think it may be the best MI yet?…



There are very few things Hollywood does right these days, and making movies is not one of them. Green Lantern is the rule, rather than the exception. Nevermind the fact that with the exception of The Dark Knight, Hollywood could not produce a comic hero or video game movie if their lives depended on it. Hollywood is all about producing movies that push their agendas these days. Gone are the days of honest story-telling, with compassionate and sympathetic, believable characters. Noticeably, about halfway through the movie, the script takes a pop shot at conservatives, and those evil Republicans. You may have missed it. However, it is still there. The vast majority of Americans are sick and tired of paying hard-earned money to have their ideals and principles bashed by some idiot behind the camera, pushing an agenda. Evidence of this? The decline of box office profits. Need I say more? Thus, we begin the story of Green Lantern. It is a story you have witnessed a thousand times before. As with all comic book hero movies, this one starts out with a little narrated back story. Billions of years before the Earth was formed, a group of immortals known as “The Guardians” harness the power of will. Hence, willpower is green for some odd reason. Who knows, maybe The Green Lantern’s original creator blew his nose while writing the original comic…? Moving on… The Guardians divide the universe up into thirty-six hundred sectors and create The Green Lantern force to protect these sectors. One Lantern per sector; here’s where the originality stops, and the clichés kick in. Every plot has to have a good guy vs. bad guy thing going on, which in this particular case is as old as the Pharaohs of Egypt. Thousands of years ago (You know, way back in the day?), a mighty Green Lantern by the name of Abin Sur, defeats the apex of evil known as Parallax. Which is nothing more than a big blob of gooey fear (literally). Original, I know. Abin Sur locks away fear in the “The Lost Sector”. Original, yet again. Then, one day a group of travelers crash-land in this “Lost Sector”. The travelers call for help, then start to explore their surroundings. While walking, the ground magically falls out from underneath them and presto – there’s fear (better known as Parallax) waiting for them. He sucks the life out of these three beings, and presto again – he’s free. Enter stage right, Abu Sir. Of course, Parallax is going around destroying worlds with fear like all good villains do. Abin Sur must find out what is destroying all of the worlds, so he flies through space in this pretty cool craft. If you guess what happens next, I’ll give you a cookie. Yep, you guessed right. Parallax tracks down the ring that imprisoned him and attacks. Abin Sur fights fear for about two seconds and then runs away. Like any good hero would do. However, in this brief exchange, he is mortally wounded. The injury makes him flee to the nearest inhabited planet. If you guess the planet, then you earn a doughnut this time. Enter stage left, our cliché hero aka Hal Jordan. You first meet Jordan as he is scrambling out of bed with some insanely hot woman he does not know. He’s late for a test flight, of course. He arrives and gets the usual pep talk about responsibility, blah, blah, blah. From this point on, we find out he’s the best pilot in the world. But, as with all pilots, he has daddy issues. Think “Hot Shots” with Charlie Sheen. You will have the basics of his daddy issues covered. Well, Abin Sur crash-lands on Earth, tells the ring to choose wisely and *BAM* the ring is off in a big ball of green joy. Guess who it finds for today’s daily double…? The green ball of joy finds Hal and flies him back to the mortally wounded Abin Sur, who rightfully recites the oath, and then dies. Long story short, Hal Jordan magically repeats the oath and *WHOOSH* away he goes to the planet Oa, home of all Green Lanterns and The Guardians. Once there, it’s like The Karate Kid meets The Highlander. He’s taught the basics of using the power of will. Of course, this is taught by some big-ass, mean instructor who thumps the hell out of him. Then, he is introduced to the head Green Lantern known as Sinestro. Who, of course, was once Abin Sur’s student and hates Hal, and humans. Sinestro thumps Hal all over the place. Hal, feeling sorry for himself, whines and goes home. In the meantime, you find out where fear comes from. Parallax was once a Guardian who tried to harness the power of fear. Guess what happened? Yep, he failed and consequently turned evil. At this point, did I mention that most of this movie is CGI? Well, it is. So much for acting anymore. Onward… Hal returns to Earth where he mopes and whines for a bit. However, this is short-lived. You see, when he left Abin Sur’s body there on the beach at the site of the crash-landing, of course the government’s men in black came to get the body. Well, they take it to a super secret facility (insert unoriginal Area 51 joke here) so they can poke and prod the remains. They call none other than Hector Hammonds to this facility to secretly autopsy the body. In the course of this, he becomes infected with fear aka Parallax’s little offsprings, transforming him into the bad guy. So while Hal is off trying to self-guru his issues, Hammond grows more powerful. With a giant head, might I add. And OF COURSE is in love with the same woman as Hal. From there, it’s pretty much what you would expect - good guy vs. bad guy, both of which love the same girl, and now must fight it out. Good guy must come to terms with fear, along with a self-sacrificing act of love. In the end, Hammond is destroyed by Parallax for failing. It’s now up to Hal to save the world. He returns to Oa, speaks to the guardians and gives his best JFK-type speech on “fearing fear”. Then he doubles back to Earth to fight fear, who by now is attacking the planet, of course. Hal puts aside his fear and battles Parallax. Finally destroying him by use of the sun. Right before all of this, The Guardians commission a yellow ring of fear with the thinking “to fight fear you need fear…”. Well, good ol’ Hal’s JFK speech works and they do not use the ring. However, Sinestro is left with it. He does what any good super hero would do. He puts on the ring and *WHAM* – instant sequel.
Long story short, Green Lantern was unoriginal and boring. I love Ryan Reynolds, well when he’s not buried in a box during the whole movie. But choosing him to play the lead role was stupid. The Green Lantern has always been a serious character, and Reynolds just cannot do it. However, he was not aided at all by the idiotic script and grossly overused CGI. In the end, really, you’ve seen this movie a thousand times….